16GB RAM MEMORY FOR MACBOOK PRO 2013 MAC

Maxing out a Mac today does not really make it last longer, especially if you maxed out only one spec. The max configuration is usually overkill for photo editing. Today, the (very expensive) maximum configuration of Unified Memory, or storage, or CPU/GPU is designed not for photo editing, but for video and 3D editing. (I have a 32GB M1 Pro.)Īlthough maxing out is necessary for the low-end Macs because the limits are so low, some time ago the pro Macs passed the point where maxing out was a reasonable option for photographers. You have to take into account how large your images are and how many applications you run at the same time.

I'm gonna disagree with both of the marked correct answers and say there are lots of Photoshop use cases where 64GB of unified memory is not a good value, especially after seeing how much less memory the early M1s needed for high performance compared to Intel Macs.

We knew there would be issues with the brand new system, so far the benefits outway the cons, and the issues will likely be resloved in time BUT GET THE 32gb. Annoying, but can be managed by knowing when they will pop up and what command is needed. Work aroud worked.Ģ) This is a photoshop issue that I imagine will be corrected with time and development on the new chip, but dialogue boxes such as 'Do you want to save before closing?' are invisible and only respond with you press return or esc, locking you out of control. Solution: Turn off trackpad while mouse is connected via accesiblities. I tried three different magic mice before the possibility of the trackpad interfering accord to me. This was really fu***** frustrating that they could do all of this design work and create a problem that hasn't existed in the past with their own NATIVE mouse. Two other photoshop issues I want to mention to save you the heartache when you start.ġ) If you use external mouse (specifically magic mouse) the mouse communication will flake out and walk your cursor up the screen (mid-edit when you are working mouse commands fast) from your left hand hover over the trackpad while using basic keyboard commands. Although it hasn't given me much trouble now, it worries me to spend this kind of money only to have a clogged down macbook 3 years down the line. As it is only 400$ more, I think I will be returning and getting the 32gb as others have suggested.

I run the latest PS configuration and it works very good, but.big but, even with the new hardware the ram is getting maxed out and sharing memory after running photoshop for about 1 hour or so, and my workflow slows down with it. I recently jumped on the 16in Pro with the M1 pro, and 16bg of memory and have had the chance to put it through extensive editing over the past month, all 50mp GFX raw files. If you can wait, wait until more photographers have tried out their Photoshop and Lightroom Classic workflows and have a better idea of how well the various combinations of CPU/GPU cores and RAM work for these applications. M1 Pro and M1 Max expand the specs well beyond M1, which already didn’t work the same way Intel x86 did. Most typical 14' MBP configurations for Photoshop and Lightroom Classic probably should not exceed $3000 unless you do a lot of work daily with large files. Maxing out all options on just the 14-inch MacBook Pro (M1 Max 10/32/16 cores, 64GB RAM, 8TB SSD) costs US$5899. It has been a long time since it made sense to “max out” a pro Mac. But if money is tight, chances are 16GB RAM will perform well enough on Apple Silicon, and better than 16GB RAM on Intel. One thing to keep in mind is that because it’s Unified Memory, RAM not needed by applications is probably available to be used by graphics that could be a reason to get 32GB if you frequently use applications that support GPU acceleration. 32GB RAM is probably the safe choice, but that is a guess until more people have a chance to run their jobs on it.īoth Lightroom Classic and Photoshop recommend 16GB RAM, so that is the baseline for good performance.

16gb ram memory for macbook pro 2013